For Schmitt, the partisan of the Spanish guerrilla has specific significance as he was . (translation by G. L. Ulmen of the German original: Theorie des Partisanen. J. Müller, ´An Irregular that cannot be Regulated´: Carl Schmitt´s theory of the. [Theorie des Partisanen English],. Theory of the partisan: intermediate commentary on the concept of the political / Carl Schmitt; translated by G. L. Ulmen. p. cm. Carl Schmitt was a conservative German jurist and political theorist. Schmitt wrote extensively . Schmitt regarded the partisan as a specific and significant phenomenon; during the . Schmitt was termed the “Crown Jurist of the Third Reich” (“Kronjurist des Dritten Reiches”) by Waldemar Gurian. . Theorie des Partisanen.

Author: Kazigul Shakalkree
Country: Switzerland
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 4 June 2013
Pages: 386
PDF File Size: 4.83 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.49 Mb
ISBN: 365-4-23519-669-6
Downloads: 45138
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Jugal

Without the tie to regularity, the partisan does not represent an alternative order and thus cannot make any claim to ideological legitimacy for guerilla tactics. Papen was motivated to do so because Prussia, by tbeorie the largest state in Germanyserved as a powerful base for the political left and provided it with institutional power, particularly in the form of the Prussian police.

Slomp Gabriella, The Theory Of The Partisan: Carl Schmitt’s Neglected Legacy – PhilPapers

Schmitt, Theory of the PartisanNew York: Although the German concept of Ausnahmezustand is best translated as “state of emergency”, it literally means ” state of exception ” which, according to Schmitt, frees the executive from any legal restraints to its power that would normally apply.

The value of theory of the Partisanin my view, lies elsewhere. Law Political philosophy more In contrast to these two forms of irregularity, the Spanish guerilla attacked the structure of political order and thus of the public sphere being established by Napoleon.

For Schmitt, however, the greatest practitioner and theorist of revolutionary war was Theofie Tse-tung, who managed to mobilise the partisan in his fights against Japanese occupation, Western colonialism and the Chinese nationalists. The core of the provisions is that a combatant should carry arms openly, wear a distinctive sign, should operate in a chain of command and conduct their operations in accordance with the laws of war.


Schmitt, in perhaps his best-known formulation, bases his conceptual realm of state sovereignty and autonomy upon the distinction partusan friend and enemy. If the constitution of a state is democratic, then every exceptional negation of democratic principles, every exercise of state power independent of the approval of the majority, can be called dictatorship.

Letters from Carl Schmitt to his son-in-law have also been published. It does not accept the limits of conventional enmity. This applies theroie any person or entity that represents a serious threat or conflict to one’s partissn interests. This distinction is to be determined “existentially”, which is to say that the enemy is whoever is “in a specially intense way, existentially something different and alien, so that in the extreme case conflicts with him are possible.

On Derrida and Foucault. Views Read Edit View history.

Carl Schmitt

The latter was the case, for example, in the theory and practice of Mao, who based his struggles on a mixture of mutually reinforcing imageries of real and absolute enmity. Jacques Derridain his Politics of Friendship remarked:. Nevertheless, in Decemberthe Schutzstaffel SS publication Das schwarze Korps accused Schmitt of being an opportunist, a Hegelian state thinker, and a Catholic, and called his anti-semitism a mere pretense, citing earlier statements in which he criticized the Nazis’ racial theories.

If the soldier in uniform is the target of the modern partisan, it is because this partisan is fighting to establish an alternative public sphere with different rules for determining who the legitimate political actors are. The latter State even officially embraced partisan warfare against foreign occupation in the Landsturm edict ofwhich put citizens under an obligation to resist foreign intruders with weapons of every kind.

On the one hand, the nation-state originates as a means of overcoming the religious civil wars, and its establishment coincides with the attempt to relegate theological disputes to a private sphere that does not threaten the structure of the state. After the Nazis forced through the passage of the Enabling Act ofwhich changed the Weimar Constitution to allow the “present government” to rule by decree, bypassing both the President, Paul von Hindenburgand the ReichstagAlfred Hugenbergthe leader of the German National People’s Party — which was one of the Nazi’s partners in the coalition government, but was being squeezed out of existence — hoped to slow down the Nazi takeover of the country by threatening to quit his ministry position in the Cabinet.


Retrieved from ” https: Every association of men is necessarily a separation from other men He saw the office of the president as a comparatively effective element, because of the power granted to the president to declare a state of exception Ausnahmezustand.

The French Revolution transforms war from something that takes place between ruling families within a single organization of the public sphere to something that is carried out between nations. Carl Schmitt and the Jews: War then became a regularized, contained activity between equal enemies. Piero Gobetti and the Politics of Liberal Revolution. Against Politics as Technology. Michigan State University Press translation by A. A year later, Schmitt supported the emergence of totalitarian power structures in his paper ” Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus ” roughly: Schmitt’s argument that political concepts are secularized theological concepts has also recently been seen as consequential for those interested in contemporary political theology.

In Theory of the PartisanSchmitt distinguishes between three kinds of enemy: Rather, Schmitt should be understood as carrying an atheistic political-theological tradition to an extreme.

Ulmen of the German original: InSchmitt gave lectures in Francoist Spaintwo of which resulted in the publication, the next year, of Theory of the Partisan Telos Press,in which he characterized the Spanish Civil War as a “war of national liberation” against “international Communism”. According to Schmitt, the United States partiean internal conflicts between economic presence and political absence, between isolationism and interventionism, are global problems, which today continue to hamper the creation of a new world order.

Does Hobbes Have a Concept of the Enemy? But dominion can be established, that is, men can be unified only in a unity against—against other men.