Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.

Author: Jukora Daishakar
Country: Guatemala
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 22 August 2015
Pages: 169
PDF File Size: 12.57 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.40 Mb
ISBN: 874-9-49733-111-8
Downloads: 38421
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Maugore

TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF

There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. Retrieved from ” https: DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view.

The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set.

The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF.

Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. These products are organized under four views:. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.

It establishes a basis for semantic i. As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.


The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.

In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means.

Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, 20. supporting, DoD functions. Views Read Edit View history. As one example, the DoDAF v1. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. Commons category link is on Wikidata. It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures. The sequence of the artifacts listed doaf gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed.

Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate. Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through doeaf organized by various views.


One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest.

The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.

DoD Business Systems Modernization: A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.

It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

In April the Version 1. All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, volumd tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i.

Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as doodaf below. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:.

The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. In other projects Wikimedia Commons.